Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
2.
Cell Rep Med ; 3(10): 100781, 2022 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2042207

ABSTRACT

Patients with blood cancer continue to have a greater risk of inadequate immune responses following three COVID-19 vaccine doses and risk of severe COVID-19 disease. In the context of the CAPTURE study (NCT03226886), we report immune responses in 80 patients with blood cancer who received a fourth dose of BNT162b2. We measured neutralizing antibody titers (NAbTs) using a live virus microneutralization assay against wild-type (WT), Delta, and Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 and T cell responses against WT and Omicron BA.1 using an activation-induced marker (AIM) assay. The proportion of patients with detectable NAb titers and T cell responses after the fourth vaccine dose increased compared with that after the third vaccine dose. Patients who received B cell-depleting therapies within the 12 months before vaccination have the greatest risk of not having detectable NAbT. In addition, we report immune responses in 57 patients with breakthrough infections after vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , Clinical Studies as Topic , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Immunity , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Cancer Cell ; 40(2): 114-116, 2022 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1588171
5.
Nat Cancer ; 2(12): 1321-1337, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1510628

ABSTRACT

Patients with cancer have higher COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Here we present the prospective CAPTURE study, integrating longitudinal immune profiling with clinical annotation. Of 357 patients with cancer, 118 were SARS-CoV-2 positive, 94 were symptomatic and 2 died of COVID-19. In this cohort, 83% patients had S1-reactive antibodies and 82% had neutralizing antibodies against wild type SARS-CoV-2, whereas neutralizing antibody titers against the Alpha, Beta and Delta variants were substantially reduced. S1-reactive antibody levels decreased in 13% of patients, whereas neutralizing antibody titers remained stable for up to 329 days. Patients also had detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells and CD4+ responses correlating with S1-reactive antibody levels, although patients with hematological malignancies had impaired immune responses that were disease and treatment specific, but presented compensatory cellular responses, further supported by clinical recovery in all but one patient. Overall, these findings advance the understanding of the nature and duration of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/immunology , Neoplasms/complications , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunity, Cellular , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasms/immunology , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Young Adult
6.
Nat Cancer ; 2: 1321-1337, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1510627

ABSTRACT

CAPTURE (NCT03226886) is a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 immunity in patients with cancer. Here we evaluated 585 patients following administration of two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccines, administered 12 weeks apart. Seroconversion rates after two doses were 85% and 59% in patients with solid and hematological malignancies, respectively. A lower proportion of patients had detectable neutralizing antibody titers (NAbT) against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) vs wildtype (WT). Patients with hematological malignancies were more likely to have undetectable NAbT and had lower median NAbT vs solid cancers against both WT and VOCs. In comparison with individuals without cancer, patients with haematological, but not solid, malignancies had reduced NAb responses. Seroconversion showed poor concordance with NAbT against VOCs. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted NAb response including against VOCs, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with undetectable NAbT. Vaccine-induced T-cell responses were detected in 80% of patients, and were comparable between vaccines or cancer types. Our results have implications for the management of cancer patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Adaptive Immunity/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/complications , Kidney Neoplasms/complications , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , BNT162 Vaccine/administration & dosage , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/administration & dosage , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunogenicity, Vaccine/immunology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/virology , Vaccination/methods
7.
Nat Med ; 27(8): 1362-1366, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1246381

ABSTRACT

Patients with cancer are currently prioritized in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination programs globally, which includes administration of mRNA vaccines. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) has not been reported with mRNA vaccines and is an extremely rare immune-related adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We present a case of CRS that occurred 5 d after vaccination with BTN162b2 (tozinameran)-the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-in a patient with colorectal cancer on long-standing anti-PD-1 monotherapy. The CRS was evidenced by raised inflammatory markers, thrombocytopenia, elevated cytokine levels (IFN-γ/IL-2R/IL-18/IL-16/IL-10) and steroid responsiveness. The close temporal association of vaccination and diagnosis of CRS in this case suggests that CRS was a vaccine-related adverse event; with anti-PD1 blockade as a potential contributor. Overall, further prospective pharmacovigillence data are needed in patients with cancer, but the benefit-risk profile remains strongly in favor of COVID-19 vaccination in this population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Cytokine Release Syndrome , COVID-19/metabolism , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL